Referee Assessment Report 2023 Referee Name*Please type the full name exactly as listed in Squadi.Field Test? Yes Please tick this if this was an upgrade assessment (Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3).Referee Coach's Name* First Last Competition*NPL (WA) First TeamNPL (WA) Under 20NPL (WA) Under 18NPLW (WA) First TeamNPLW (WA) Under 23State League Division 1 First TeamState League Division 1 ReservesState League Division 1 Under 18State League Division 2 First TeamState League Division 2 ReservesState League Division 2 Under 18CupHome Team*Away Team*Home Team*ArmadaleBalcatta EtnaBayswater CityCockburn CityPerth RedStarFloreat AthenaOlympic KingswayInglewood UnitedPerth GloryPerth SCStirling MacedoniaSorrentoHome Team*Balcatta EtnaCurtin UniversityFremantle CityHyundai NTCMurdoch University MelvillePerth RedStarPerth SCSubiacoHome Team*Dianella White EaglesForrestfield UnitedFremantle CityJoondalup UnitedMandurah CityGwelup CroatiaGosnells CityRockingham CitySubiacoMurdoch University MelvilleUWA-NedlandsWestern KnightsHome Team*BalgaCanning CityCarramar Shamrock RoversCurtin UniversityAshfieldQuinns FCJoondalup CityMaddington – Kalamunda FCKingsley WestsideMorley-WindmillsSwan UnitedWanneroo CityAway Team*BalgaCanning CityCarramar Shamrock RoversCurtin UniversityAshfieldQuinns FCJoondalup CityMaddington – Kalamunda FCKingsley WestsideMorley-WindmillsSwan UnitedWanneroo CityAway Team*Balcatta EtnaCurtin UniversityFremantle CityHyundai NTCMurdoch University MelvillePerth RedStarPerth SCSubiacoAway Team*Murdoch University MelvilleForrestfield UnitedFremantle CityJoondalup UnitedMandurah CityGwelup CroatiaGosnells CityRockingham CitySubiacoDianella White EaglesUWA-NedlandsWestern KnightsAway Team*ArmadaleBalcatta EtnaBayswater CityCockburn CityPerth RedStarFloreat AthenaOlympic KingswayInglewood UnitedPerth GloryPerth SCStirling MacedoniaSorrentoDate* DD slash MM slash YYYY Key Performance IndicatorsFailure to meet the KPI means a maximum score of 5 for the corresponding component. 8 – Very Good 7 – Good 6 – Competent 5 – Ordinary 4 – Weak 3 – Disappointing 2 – Poor 1 – Very PoorKPI 1 – Did the referee protect player safety by correctly interpreting & applying the Laws?*YesNo (maximum score of 5 for Interpretation and Application of the Laws)KPI 2 – Was the image of the game protected (technical area)?*YesNo (maximum score of 5 for Performance of Duties)KPI 3 – Was the image of the game protected (melees)?*YesNo (maximum score of 5 for Performance of Duties)KPI 4 – Did the referee deal with dissent appropriately?*YesNo (maximum score of 5 for Discipline)Interpretation and Application of the Laws (KPI 1)*8 (x4)7 (x4)6 (x4)5 (x4)4 (x4)3 (x4)2 (x4)1 (x4)Were the Laws applied consistently and appropriately i.e. judgement of careless, reckless and excessive force; advantage play?Interpretation and Application of the Laws (KPI 1 failed)*543210Were the Laws applied consistently and appropriately i.e. judgement of careless, reckless and excessive force; advantage play?Comments – Interpretation and Application of the Laws*Performance of Duties (KPI 2 & 3)*8 (x2)7 (x2)6 (x2)5 (x2)4 (x2)3 (x2)2 (x2)1 (x2)Managing technical areas, dealing with mass confrontation, attention to detail; co-operation with ARs and 4th official; clarity of decisions; timing; wall management; handling of injuries.Performance of Duties (KPI 2 and/or 3 failed)*54321Managing technical areas, dealing with mass confrontation, attention to detail; co-operation with ARs and 4th official; clarity of decisions; timing; wall management; handling of injuries.Comments – Performance of Duties*Discipline (KPI 4)*87654321Were the sanctions imposted on players appropriate for the offences committed?Discipline (KPI 4 failed)*54321Were the sanctions imposted on players appropriate for the offences committed?Comments – Discipline*Personality*87654321Sense of authority; firm but fair; personality influenced player behaviour?Comments – Personality*Fitness*87654321Did the referee’s fitness and stamina meet the requirements of the game?Comments – Fitness*Positioning*87654321Was the referee able to read the game and therefore was in the best position?Comments – Positioning*Performance Strengths – 1Performance Strengths – 2Performance Strengths – 3Development Points – 1Solutions to Development Points – 1*Development Points – 2Solutions to Development Points – 2*Development Points – 3Solutions to Development Points – 3*Summary*Running Sheet UploadMax. file size: 128 MB.Picture Upload Drop files here or Select files Max. file size: 128 MB. This field is hidden when viewing the formMark